Instructor
- Professor Sue Becker, becker at mcmaster dot ca
- Office hours: by appointment.
Course Assistance - TAs:
- Malcolm Pilgrim, pilgrim at mcmaster dot ca
- Xue Han, hanx3 at mcmaster dot ca
Schedule
- Mondays 9:30-10:20, Thursdays 9:30-11:20, PC-335
Course Objectives
This course will survey findings in several major areas of cognitive
neuroscience, using a range of methods including brain
imaging, neural network modelling, and behavioural testing of
neuropsychological patients, toward an understanding of the neural
mechanisms underlying cognition. Lectures will cover both textbook chapters
and 24 selected readings from the current literature. Students
are expected to develop an appreciation for the range of techniques used by
cognitive neuroscientists, when they are applicable, and what they tell us
about a range of cognitive and brain functions, as well as an ability to evaluate
critically the scientific literature.
During the first two weeks, introductory material will be covered in a
traditional lecture format. In subsequent weeks, for each of the 6 major topic
areas, there will be a one-hour
introductory lecture given by the instructor followed by four hours
of paper presentations and discussions, with the papers
presented by students, and the instructor and TA's directing and facilitating the discussions.
Materials and Fees
- 1. Course text:
Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind, 3rd Edition, By
M.S. Gazzaniga, R.B. Ivry and G.R. Mangun, NY: W.W. Norton & Company, 2009.
- 2. 24 articles from the recent
literature (see online version of syllabus).
To promote a high quality of in-class discussion,
students are expected to
have at least skimmed every paper before class, and to have read in great
detail the 3 or more papers for which they are writing critiques.
The readings are freely available electronically from the McMaster library web
pages (accessible from any on-campus computer). For your convenience,
links to these online resources are included below.
Overview and Assessment
In extreme cases such as after an unanticipated university closure
it may be necessary to revise the assessment scheme detailed below.
The instructor reserves the right to modify elements of the
assessment scheme as required and will provide students with as much prior
notification and consusltation as possible, both in class and on the course
website.
| Participation | 10% |
| At least three 2-page critiques of papers (best 3 count) | 30% |
| One 20-30 minute oral presentation | 20% |
| One final take-home exam | 40% |
Participation
Marks for participation are based on 1) providing feedback to other students
on their presentations, by filling out a very brief evaluation form
at the end of each
presentation, and 2) contributing to the class discussions of
the 24 papers.
The participation mark will be calculated as follows:
- Attendance at all presentations and Feedback presenters: 1 mark for submitting 1-5 feedback forms with informative and
helpful feedback, 2 marks for 6-10 forms, 3 marks for 11-15, 4 marks for 16-20, and
5 marks for 21 or more.
- Contribution to discussions: 1 mark for contributing in a substantial way
(not just asking clarification type questions) to 1 paper
discussion, 2 marks for 2-3, 3 marks for 4-7,
4 marks for 8-11, 5 marks for 12 or more.
Critiques
Students will each be randomly assigned 6 papers covering all 6 topic
areas. Of those, they can choose at least 3 papers to critique, but
the first critique (Learning and Memory topic) is NON-OPTIONAL.
No matter how many critiques are turned in, only the best 3 scores will be
counted. Critiques are due at the start of class on the day the paper is being
presented. Hard-copy only.
Late critiques submitted after the paper has been presented in class
will not be accepted under any circumstances.
Please read the
guidelines and marking scheme for critiques on
this link.
An example of a well written critique by a student who
previously took Psych3BN3 can be found on
this link (pdf file).
Presentations
Each student will be assigned a paper to be presented.
Depending on course enrolment, each presentation will be either given
individually or by a pair of students.
Students' requests to present individually or to
for a specific partner will be accommodated whenever possible.
In either case, you
(as an individual or pair of presenters) must meet with
your instructor at least 1 week prior to your presentation date. Your
outline is due at the time of this meeting and should include a point-form
summary of what you consider to be the most important points in the article
(intro, methods, results and discussion). For pair presentations, your
outlines can either be written individually, each covering their own section, or
jointly covering both students' parts of the presentation and will be marked
as an individual or joint piece of work accordingly.
Please read the
guidelines and marking scheme for presentations on
this link.
The assignment of critiques and paper presentation
dates
can be found at this link.
Final exam
The final exam will be distributed during the regular final exam period. It is
expected to take no more than one day to complete, but students will be given
1 week in order to fit this in around their other exams.
There will be 6 exam questions, one per major topic area covered in the
course, and students will be asked to provide (max 2 pages each,
double-spaced) answers to 4 of the 6 questions.
Sample final exam questions from previous years can be found on
this link.
Lecture topics, readings, and links to lecture
outlines
(outlines to be added at least 24 hours before each
lecture.
Readings to be finalized within the next few days. )
At certain points in the course it may make good sense to
modify the schedule outlined below. The instructor reserves the right to
modify elements of the course and will notify students accordingly, both in
class and by posting any changes to the course website.
Introductory Lectures
Sept 8, 12, 15, 19: Introduction to the nervous
system, and cognitive neuroscience methods.
- Links to lecture outlines:
Lecture 1, Sept 8, (pdf
file)
Lecture 2, Sept 8, hour 2, (pdf file)
Lecture 3, Sept 12, (pdf file)
Lecture 4, chapter 4, part I, Sept 15,
pdf
Lecture 5, chapter 4, part II, Sept 15,
pdf
Lecture 6, chapter 4, part III, Sept 19,
pdf
- Readings: Chapters 1-4 in Gazzaniga textbook.
Topic 1: Learning and memory
- Link to lecture outline:
pdf file
- Readings:
- Sept 22 (lecture)
Chapter 8 in Gazzaniga book.
- LM1 Sept 22
Polyn, SM, et al. "Category-specific cortical activity precedes retrieval
during memory search." Science 310.5756 (2005):1963-1966.
Link to article in McMaster e-resources
- Link to James and Morgan'spresentation:
Colour pdf,
Greyscale pdf
- LM2 Sept 26
Kuhl, Brice A, et al. "Fidelity of neural reactivation reveals competition
between memories." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the
United States of America 108.14 (2011):5903-5908.
Link to article in McMaster e-resources
- Link to Krista and Gillian's presentation:
pdf
- LM3 Oct 3
NOTE CHANGE OF DATE
Hoscheidt, Siobhan M, et al. "Hippocampal activation during retrieval of
spatial context from episodic and semantic memory." Behavioural brain research
212.2 (2010):121-132.
Link to article in McMaster e-resources
- Link to Kate and Christina's presentation:
pdf
- LM4 Sept 29
Kikuchi, Hirokazu, et al. "Memory Repression: Brain Mechanisms underlying
Dissociative Amnesia." Journal of cognitive neuroscience 22.3 (2010):602-613.
Link to article in McMaster e-resources
- Link to Tammy and Ben's presentation:
pdf
Topic 2: Cerebral lateralization
- Link to lecture outline:
pdf file
- Readings:
- October 6 (lecture)
Chapter 11, Gazzaniga
- CL1 Oct 6
(NOTE: Those presenting or critiquing CL1 should cover BOTH
the Roberts & Ivry and the Hsiao et al CL1 articles)
- Robertson, L.C. & Ivry, R.B. (2000). Hemispheric asymmetries: Attention to
visual and auditory primitives. Current Directions in Psychological Science,
9, 59-63.
Link to article on Ivry's website (off-campus link)
- Hsiao, Janet H, Danke XShieh, and Garrison WCottrell. "Convergence of the
Visual Field Split: Hemispheric Modeling of Face and Object Recognition."
Journal of cognitive neuroscience 20.12 (2008):2298-2307.
Link to article in McMaster e-resources
- Link to Kieran and Cailin's presentation:
pdf
- CL2 Oct 13
Landis, Theodor. "Emotional words: What's so different from just words?."
Cortex 42.6 (2006):823-830.
Link to article in McMaster e-resources
- Link to Atara and Perri's presentation:
pdf
- CL3 Oct 13
Peng, Gang. "Hemisphere lateralization is influenced by bilingual status and
composition of words." Neuropsychologia 49.7 (2011):1981-1986.
Link to article in McMaster e-resources
- Link to Ranya and Ibrahim's presentation:
pdf
- CL4 Oct 17
Vanlancker Sidtis, D. "When only the right hemisphere is left: Studies in
language and communication." Brain and language 91.2 (2004):199-211.
link to article in McMaster e-resources
- Link to Suja and So-Hyun's presentation:
pdf
Topic 3: Emotion
- Link to lecture outline:
pdf file
- Readings:
- Oct 20 (Lecture)
Chapter 9 in Gazzaniga textbook
- EM1 Oct 20:
Funayama, ES, et al. "A double dissociation in the affective modulation of
startle in humans: Effects of unilateral temporal lobectomy." Journal of
cognitive neuroscience 13.6 (2001):721-729.
link to article in McMaster e-resources
NOTE: Click on the 2nd link "Full text Online Publisher's Website"
rather than the first link "Full text available from E-Journals - Scholars
Portal" as the first seems to require a uid and password
- Link to Devina and Usman's presentation:
pdf
- EM2 Oct 24
Phelps, EA, et al. "Performance on indirect measures of race evaluation
predicts amygdala activation." Journal of cognitive neuroscience 12.5
(2000):729-738.
link to article in McMaster e-resources
- Link to Lora and Gabriella's presentation:
pdf
- EM3 Oct 27
Siegle, Greg J, et al. "Increased amygdala and decreased dorsolateral
prefrontal BOLD responses in unipolar depression: Related and independent
features." Biological psychiatry 61.2 (2007):198-209.
link to article in McMaster e-resources
- Link to Stefanie and Kristen's presentation:
pdf
- EM4 Oct 27
Sommer, Monika, et al. "In psychopathic patients emotion attribution modulates
activity in outcome-related brain areas." Psychiatry research. Neuroimaging
182.2 (2010):88-95.
link to article in McMaster e-resources
- Link to Bianca and Marcella'spresentation:
pdf
Topic 4: Attention and Consciousness
- Link to lecture outline:
pdf file
- Readings:
- Oct 31 (lecture):
Chapter 12 in Gazzaniga book
- AC1 Nov 3:
Wieser, Matthias J, Lisa MMcTeague, and AndreasKeil. "Sustained Preferential
Processing of Social Threat Cues: Bias without Competition?." Journal of
cognitive neuroscience 23.8 (2011):1973-1986.
link to article in McMaster e-resources
- Link to Ivana and Olivia's presentation:
pdf
- AC2 Nov 3
Hsieh, Po-Jang, Jaron TColas, and NancyKanwisher. "Pop-Out Without Awareness:
Unseen Feature Singletons Capture Attention Only When Top-Down Attention Is
Available." Psychological science 22.9 (2011):1220-1226.
link to article in McMaster e-resources
- Link to Augustina's presentation:
pdf
- AC3 Nov 7
Del Cul, A, et al. "Causal role of prefrontal cortex in the threshold
for access to consciousness." Brain 132(2009):2531-2540.
link to article in McMaster e-resources
- Link to Collins and Justin'spresentation:
pdf
- AC4 Nov 10:
Hesselmann, Guido, MartinHebart, and RafaelMalach. "Differential BOLD Activity
Associated with Subjective and Objective Reports during "Blindsight" in Normal
Observers." The Journal of neuroscience 31.36 (2011):12936-12944.
link to article in McMaster e-resources
- Link to Jana and Adrian's presentation:
pdf
Topic 5: Reward, decision-making and cognitive control
- Link to lecture outline:
pdf file
- Readings:
- Nov 10(lecture)
Chapter 13 in Gazzaniga textbook; see also the section of the 'Social
Cognition' chapter on orbitofrontal cortex and social decision-making
- RD1 Nov 14:
Cikara, Mina, Matthew MBotvinick, and Susan TFiske. "Us Versus Them: Social
Identity Shapes Neural Responses to Intergroup Competition and Harm."
Psychological science 22.3 (2011):306-313.
link to article in McMaster e-resources
- Link to Vlad's presentation:
pdf
- RD2 Nov 17
Spreng, R.N. Stevens, W.D., Chamberlain, J.P., Gilmore, A.W. and
Schacter, D.L. (2010), Default network activity, coupled with the
frontoparietal control network, supports goal-directed cognition,
Neuroimage 53 (1):303-317
link to article in McMaster e-resources
- Link to Laura and Amanda's presentation:
pdf
- RD3 Nov 17
O'Doherty, JP, et al. "Temporal difference models and reward-related learning
in the human brain." Neuron 38.2 (2003):329-337.
link to article in McMaster e-resources
- Link to Simrin and Arundev's presentation:
pdf
- RD4 Nov 21:
Talmi, Deborah, et al. "How Humans Integrate the Prospects of Pain and Reward
during Choice." The Journal of neuroscience 29.46 (2009):14617-14626.
link to article in McMaster e-resources
Topic 6: Language
- Link to lecture outline:
pdf file
- Readings:
- Nov 24 (lecture)
Chapter 10 in Gazzaniga textbook
- LA1 Nov 24:
(those critiqueing/presenting LA1 should
do both of the following articles:)
- Corballis, Michael C. "Mirror neurons and the evolution of
language." Brain and Language 112(1):25-35
link to article in McMaster e-resources
- Iverson, J.M. and Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005), Gesture paves the way
for language development, Psychological Science 16(5):367-371
link to article in McMaster e-resources
- Link to Onyeka and Sierra's presentation:
pdf
- LA2 Nov 28:
Courtin, Cyril, et al. "A common neural system is activated in hearing
non-signers to process French Sign language and spoken French." Brain research
bulletin 84.1 (2011):75-87.
link to article in McMaster e-resources
- Link to Madison's presentation:
pdf
- LA3 Dec 1:
Davoli, Christopher C, et al. "When meaning matters, look but don't touch: The
effects of posture on reading." Memory & cognition 38.5 (2010):555-562.
link to article in McMaster e-resources (Note: Use the "Springer" link rather
than the "ProQuest" link to get the article pdf from here
- Link to Lisa and Courney's presentation:
pdf
- LA4 Dec 1:
Richardson, DC, et al. "Spatial representations activated during real-time
comprehension of verbs." Cognitive science 27.5 (2003):767-780.
link to article in McMaster e-resources
- Link to Maji and Atif's presentation:
pdf
Missed Presentations
If a student must miss a presentation due to illness, then as per McMaster's
Policy For Absence from School Due to Illness or Compassionate Reasons
"... you must bring appropriate documentation to
the Office of the Associate Dean of Science (Studies) within one week of the
original date of the missed work, and fill out the Request for Accommodation
of Missed Academic Work form .
For further details see
http://www.science.mcmaster.ca/~associatedean/forms/missedwork.html.
In such cases, the student will be required to schedule an individual
appointment with the instructors at an alternative time to give his/her
presentation.
In addition, the student is asked to email the instructor and the teaching
assistant with as much advance notice as possible, because one of them will
have to cover the student's missed presentation during the originally
scheduled class time so that other students may still take part in the paper
discussion.
Calculator requirement:
- Calculators will not be required during tests.
Calendar Description
- See
http://registrar.mcmaster.ca/CALENDAR/current/pg1837.html#19326.
Academic integrity:
You are expected to exhibit honesty and use ethical behaviour in all aspects
of the learning process. Academic credentials you earn are rooted in
principles of honesty and academic integrity.
Academic dishonesty is to knowingly act or fail to act in a way that results
or could result in unearned academic credit or advantage. This behaviour can
result in serious consequences, e.g. the grade of zero on an assignment, loss
of credit with a notation on the transcript (notation reads: .Grade of F
assigned for academic dishonesty.), and/or suspension or expulsion from the
university.
It is your responsibility to understand what constitutes academic
dishonesty. For information on the various types of academic dishonesty please
refer to the Academic Integrity Policy, located at
http://www.mcmaster.ca/academicintegrity
The following illustrates only three forms of academic dishonesty:
- Plagiarism, e.g. the submission of work that is not one.s own or for which
other credit has been obtained.
- Improper collaboration in group work.
- Copying or using unauthorized aids in tests and examinations.
Notice of changes to course structure:
The university reserves the right to modify elements
of the course during the term. The university may change the dates
and deadlines for any or all courses in extreme circumstances. If
either type of modification becomes necessary, reasonable notice and
communication with the students will be given with explanation and
the opportunity to comment on changes. It is the responsibility of
the student to check their McMaster email and course websites weekly
during the term and to note any changes."
The professor reserves the right to change any
and all course requirements if the need should
arise. Any change in the course requirements
will be posted on the webpage and emailed to the class, and the details
will be announced in class. Any concerns about
announced changes should be addressed with the
professor as soon as the changes are announced.
Related courses taught by Sue Becker
- Psych 4BN3 - Cognitive Neuroscience II
- Psych 734 -
Neural network models of cognition and perception (graduate course)
Outline Last Revised: Sept 7, 2011.