Danger and intention in human cognitive evolution.
Two problems that animals face are figuring
out which things in the environment are dangerous,
and figuring out others' intentions. These problems
overlap in the case of inferring hostile intent
in dangerous living things. However, neither danger
nor intention are overtly perceivable in the same
way as color, shape, or distance. They must be
inferred using a combination of perceptual cues
and contextual information. In this talk I present
a series of studies examining the cognitive machinery
that humans use to make such inferences. Some parts
of this machinery are probably phylogenetically
old, and other parts more recently derived. I discuss
the implications of these studies for the design
of human cognitive architecture, including conceptual
development and mind reading.